Analysis: “Real Profit” vs. Restatement Impact – NMBZ Holdings Limited | FY2025 Financial Review

Published: 9 April 2026

Analysis: “Real Profit” vs. Restatement Impact

NMBZ Holdings Limited | FY2025 Financial Review

The Performance Paradox

On the surface, NMBZ Holdings reported a decisive turnaround in FY2025, swinging from a loss to a Profit After Tax (PAT) of ZWG 251 million. However, this “turnaround” is heavily distorted by retrospective adjustments to the 2024 comparative figures. To understand the “Real Profit,” we must adjust for prior-period errors and  extraordinary 2025 costs.

The Restatement “Black Hole” (FY2024 Impact)

The most significant analytical hurdle in the 2025 report is the restatement of 2024 figures.

  • Original Reported 2024 Profit: ZWG 43 million.
  • Restated 2024 Result: ZWG 205 million LOSS.
  • Total Swing: ZWG 248 million.

Drivers of the Restatement:

  • SAP Migration Errors: Data gaps and reconciliation issues during the transition to the SAP core banking system (fully operational Oct 2025).
  • Tax Disallowance: A retrospective tax ruling regarding interest expenses that resulted in a ZWG 43.7 million charge being pushed back into the 2024 accounts.

Normalizing 2025: Finding the “Real Profit”

The reported ZWG 251 million profit for 2025 does not fully reflect operational excellence because it was burdened by significant “once-off” or extraordinary items.

Item Impact (ZWG) Description
Reported PAT (2025) 251.0M Official audited figure.
(+) Tax Disallowance +94.5M Non-recurring tax cost specifically for 2025.
(+) Restructuring Costs +127.0M Once-off staff rationalization/retrenchment.
Adjusted “Real” PAT 472.5M Underlying operational performance.

Key Insight: The “Real Profit” of the group is nearly 88% higher than the reported profit. This suggests the core engine of the bank is performing exceptionally well, despite the “noise” created by system migrations and tax disputes.

Core Operational Performance Drivers

Ignoring the restatements, the underlying business showed robust growth:

  • Net Interest Income: Grew by 31%, driven by an expanded loan book and the new Microfinance division.
  • Fee and Commission Income: Up 30% to ZWG 1.2 billion.
    • Digital Banking: Grew 49%, validating the “Digital First” strategy.
    • International Banking: Grew 43%, showing strong utilization of the US$180m+ lines of credit.
  • Fintech (Xplug Solutions): Now a profitable contributor, generating ZWG 26M in revenue across 8 African countries.

Risk and Quality of Earnings

Despite the strong “Real Profit,” two major risks persist:

  1. Audit Qualification: The 2025 consolidated results received a qualified opinion specifically regarding the comparative 2024 figures. This “data gap” in Q1 2024 makes year-on-year growth percentages statistically unreliable.
  2. Tax Sensitivity: The group’s effective tax rate was artificially elevated by the ZWG 94.5M disallowance. While this is likely a one-time hit, it highlights the regulatory risk in the current environment.

Conclusion

NMBZ’s 2025 results are a classic case of “Operational Success vs. Reporting Friction.” If an investor looks only at the reported ZWG 251M profit, they miss the fact that NMBZ is actually a ZWG 470M+ profit generating machine currently being cleaned up of legacy migration errors and restructuring costs. With the SAP system now fully operational and the retrenchment costs behind them, 2026 is positioned to be a much “cleaner” and potentially more profitable year.

 

Find More

Categories

Follow Us

Feel free to follow us on social media for the latest news and more inspiration.

Related Content